CIF Bowl Game Breakdowns (North)

Central Catholic head coach Roger Canepa speaks to his team after 42-35 victory last week over Sonora in CIF Sac-Joaquin Section Division IV championship. Photo: Mark Tennis.

Central Catholic head coach Roger Canepa speaks to his team after 42-35 victory last week over Sonora in CIF Sac-Joaquin Section Division IV championship. Photo: Mark Tennis.


Check here for teams we think will get bowl bids in next week’s Northern California regional bowls and for those that we are recommending to get picked. We will be posting these divisions throughout Saturday night and into Sunday morning as they are completed.

(All selections for the CIF regional bowl games – north and south – will be made on Sunday morning by a committee comprised of the 10 CIF section commissioners. The announcement of teams selected will be made at approximately 1 p.m. via the CIF Facebook and Twitter page.)

For this weekend’s State Top 25 scoreboard, CLICK HERE.
For info on Jan. 31 Cal-Hi Sports/Gold Medal Excellence Speed Camp at Palisades HS, CLICK HERE.
For info on Dec. 31 My Goal Mine webinar for new goal-setting smart phone app, CLICK HERE.

Oh, and by the way, please consider signing up for your Gold Club membership today so you can see everything that we do to enrich California high school sports and with 35 years of doing it. CLICK HERE for details.

CIF logo 216

OPEN DIVISION
Should be picked:
De La Salle of Concord (13-0)
Will be picked: Same
Case for De La Salle: With the way it has dominated this season and was even ahead of the Spartans for a while in computer rankings, Folsom (14-0) deserves at least a mention to be discussed for the lone NorCal Open Division bid. All it will take for DLS to put a quick halt to it, however, is mentioning last year’s blowout (48-17), the blowout in 2012 (42-14) and the facts that the Spartans have never lost to CIF Sac-Joaquin Section team and that they haven’t lost to another NorCal school in 23 years. Sure, it should be mostly about this year, but historical facts just get in the way to choose Folsom.

DIVISION I
Should be picked:
Folsom (14-0) vs. Grant of Sacramento (14-0).
Will be picked: Same.
Case for Folsom: After a 55-7 triumph over Tracy for the CIF Sac-Joaquin Section Division I title, the Bulldogs have yet to be tested. They naturally fall to the top seed for D1 North with De La Salle taking NorCal’s Open Division slot for the sixth straight season. Most around the region think this is the best team Folsom has had and would be giving the Spartans a much tougher game and might be even be better this year than in 2012 and 2013.
Case for Grant: It wasn’t easy and a bad call by a referee may have aided in the Pacers’ defeating St. Mary’s of Stockton 21-14 in Friday’s CIFSJS D2 final, but with the anticipation building for a possible Folsom-Grant matchup in this bowl game for months there’s nothing that prevents the CIF commissioners from voting for it. Grant notched wins over Elk Grove and Jesuit in its league, then beat Vacaville in the section semis before playing St. Mary’s.
Case for Sacred Heart Prep: Any team that goes 13-0 and wins the CCS Open Division title has to be seriously considered for this game and that should be the same for the Gators. Due to strength of schedule (especially league but not so much playoffs), however, SHP needed Grant to lose to St. Mary’s to really have a shot at the matchup with Folsom.

Oakdale fullback Frankie Trent is part of that team's hard-to-stop running game. Photo: Mark Tennis.

Oakdale senior fullback Frankie Trent is part of that team’s hard-to-stop running game. Photo: Mark Tennis.

DIVISION II
Should be picked:
Clayton Valley of Concord (13-0) vs. Oakdale (13-1)
Will be picked: Clayton Valley of Concord (13-0) vs. Enterprise of Redding (11-1). Just a hunch that enough will be convinced that this is the more attractive matchup although we are ranking Oakdale higher.
Case for Clayton Valley: Ugly Eagles’ head coach Tim Murphy had his 12-1 Clovis East team on the board in 2006 but the CIF Central Section D1 champions were passed over for the first CIF Division I bowl game in favor of Canyon Country, however this year his team’s selection is pretty much a foregone conclusion. The team’s case for the game actually was strengthened in recent weeks by Tracy getting to the CIF Sac-Joaquin Section D1 final and Clayton Valley having a win over the Bulldogs. The Ugly Eagles also have a 52-14 win over a Napa team that beat Vacaville in league play and Vaca was the team that beat Enterprise.
Case for Oakdale: The two toughest choices for the commissioners on Sunday will be for this slot and for the north in D3 and both involve the CIF Northern Section. We went over this one until 3 a.m. on Sunday and came up with Oakdale as the pick and higher ranked team. Unlike Enterprise, which has a loss to Vacaville (from SJS D2 semifinals), Oakdale’s loss is to a team from its league, Sierra of Manteca. The Mustangs did not avenge that loss in the SJS D3 playoffs, but they whomped Rio Linda 41-14 one week after Rio Linda ousted Sierra. Oakdale also topped Inderkum of Sacramento in its section final and Inderkum was a team that had just a two-point loss to SJS D1 semifinalist Monterey Trail and had a win over NCS D5 winner Salesian. Owning a 20-point over two-time CIF D4 state champ Central Catholic also stands out since it was more lop-sided than Central’s loss to even St. Mary’s of Stockton.
Case for Enterprise: What makes this call more interesting is how the CIF commissioners will view a team that won in the bowl game it is up for the next year with a weaker case. Unlike last year, the Hornets are not undefeated and their 20-point loss was to Vacaville (which did not win its league title). The key will be for CIF Northern Section commissioner Liz Kyle to convince enough other voters that the loss to Vacaville was not that bad and that Enterprise has done enough to deserve getting the chance to defend its title in this game. It’s not part of the criteria for the commissioners look at the matchups themselves, but what helps Enterprise is that an Oakdale-Clayton Valley game was played two years ago. Enterprise vs. Clayton Valley matches last year’s winner in the game and this year’s front-runner. Still, looking at the scores involving Vacaville, Enterprise, Clayton Valley and Napa, the CIF frankly just might have a better game if it’s Oakdale vs. the Ugly Eagles.

DIVISION III
Should be picked:
Campolindo of Moraga (14-0) vs. Sutter (13-0)
Will be picked: Campolindo of Moraga (14-0) vs. Sutter (13-0)
Case for Campolindo: The Cougars didn’t do the CIF commissioners any favors by getting upset on Saturday by Marin Catholic in the NCS D3 final. They won 27-21 and will go into the NorCal D3 game as the favorite no matter who they play. Campo’s best win of the season was 52-27 over Napa, which later defeated Vacaville in a league game.
Case for Sutter: The Huskies didn’t play but just about every result broke their way to strengthen their case to get the second bowl berth in this division. First, Sutter simply dominated all of its foes during the season. Second, one of those foes, Justin-Siena of Napa, knocked off St. Mary’s of Berkeley in the NCS D4 final. And third, the team’s close contender for this slot, Aptos, didn’t get any help from Salinas or St. Mary’s of Stockton. Aptos does have a much better strength of schedule, but just not quite enough to flip a ranking we’ve had in Sutter’s favor for the entire season so far.
Case for Aptos: The Mariners did get their second straight CCS Division III title with an 11-8 win over St. Ignatius of San Francisco, but in the end the WCAL didn’t win in the CCS Open Division and didn’t win the CCS Open Division consolation bracket. It also hurt their case that Salinas didn’t win the CCS D1 title (which was a team they beat). Losing to Granite Bay 27-12 is more than respectable but the Grizzlies probably needed to go further than losing to Tracy in the SJS D1 semifinals. If Sutter had any chinks in its armor (like a close game), then Aptos goes in front. Sutter didn’t and in the end we also don’t think the commissioners are going to want to re-visit the same outcry from Sutter that they faced in 2012 from Wasco. Winning by more than 11-8 also would have helped Aptos.

DIVISION IV
Should be picked:
Central Catholic of Modesto (10-3) vs. McClymonds of Oakland (8-4, 12-0 not including forfeits)
Will be picked: Central Catholic vs. Capital Christian of Sacramento (13-0)
Case for Central Catholic: The Raiders are the two-time defending CIF Division IV state bowl champs and won their third straight Sac-Joaquin Section D4 title last week. Similar questions were heard about them this season – such as they aren’t as good as last year – but they clearly belong back in this game as a two-time defending state champion.
Case for McClymonds: We know the CIF commissioners won’t pull the trigger on a team with four forfeit losses, but the Warriors probably are the only team in the North that could realistically beat Central Catholic. Even without the player in the controversial eligility case, Mack seems better than last year.
Case for Capital Christian: At 13-0 and with two wins over a Modesto Christian team that was 11-0 vs everyone else, the Cougars are a viable option for the commissioners instead of McClymonds. They have explosive players such as Justice Shelton-Mosley and Edward Ware and outscored their foes 679-146. A case certainly can be made for North Coast Section D5 champion Salesian, which has a forfeit win over McClymonds (lost on the field) and a loss on the field to Inderkum of Sacramento. Choosing Salesian would just further infuriate the McClymonds people since the Warriors were clearly better when the two teams played on the field. Capital Christian isn’t part of the McClymonds forfeit mess.

Mark Tennis is the co-founder and publisher of CalHiSports.com. He can be reached at markjtennis@gmail.com. Don’t forget to follow Mark on the Cal-Hi Sports Twitter handle: @CalHiSports


Enjoy this article?

Find out how you can get access to more exclusive content, one-of-a-kind California high school sports content!

Learn More

17 Comments

  1. Cal 14
    Posted December 7, 2014 at 9:35 am | Permalink

    Sutter’s best win was against Justin-Siena. Aptos arguably played four games against teams equal to, or better than Justin-Siena, going 3-1 in those games. Granite Bay was light years better than anyone on Sutter’s schedule. You and I have gone ’round and ’round on this, but your criteria is *not* the same as the voters. You get to consider margin of victory, while the voters are strictly forbidden to do so… unless you’d like to lay some sort of accusation that they actually do violate their own stated agenda.

    What would Aptos have done against Sutter’s schedule? Gone 13-0. What would Sutter have done against Aptos’s schedule? Maybe 12-1 (depending on which Salinas team showed up).

    Sutter did make an effort to schedule good intersectional games, but El Cerrito and Novato didn’t really cooperate with good seasons. Salinas and Granite Bay did. St. Ignatius only lost to CCS Open finalist Bellarmine by 3 and beat SJS D-II finalist St. Mary’s. Could Justin-Siena have done that? Heck, could Sutter have done that?

    • Mark Tennis
      Posted December 7, 2014 at 9:57 am | Permalink

      Of course, the voters look at the scores and whether it’s 49-7 or 40-0 or whatever it’s obvious what a blowout is. Doesn’t have to be 60-0. SI at the end of the day goes 7-6 and I know how close those games were but those WCAL teams ended up not as good as usual and we just don’t know how good Sutter is.

      • darrensf
        Posted December 7, 2014 at 10:11 am | Permalink

        I only hope the CIF agrees with the unanimous posters here and not Mark. Aptos CCS should represent. You mentioned, “we don’t know how good Sutter is”… but we do know how good Aptos and Campy are! The choice is clear.

  2. Macktyson
    Posted December 7, 2014 at 9:55 am | Permalink

    I don’t see CCS getting shut out, SHP isn’t going to make D1 game which leaves only Aptos left who is deserving of a bid so I believe they get in over Sutter. Enterprise over Oakdale in D2 so NS is represented as well. Makes perfect sense to me.

  3. darrensf
    Posted December 7, 2014 at 10:06 am | Permalink

    I couldn’t agree more with the comment above. Sorry, but Aptos plays in a much much stronger section and these guys went back to back. Clearly Aptos is the more attractive team here and should play against Campy.

    Also Mark, why should CIF choose 2 teams from up North where the schools are so weak and none from the CCS? Give me a break!

    If Enterprise goes, which they should, then Sutter should stay home. You really think the CIF should leave the CCS out of the equation with both SH and Aptos having such strong years? Did you even consider that Mark?

    • Jeff
      Posted December 7, 2014 at 10:38 am | Permalink

      Darren’s biased comment about teams from “up North” being weak just doesn’t fly anymore. It doesn’t matter where good teams come from. Saying Sutter should stay home if Enterprise gets selected so the CCS gets a game, is not logical criteria, as their in different divisions.

      Last year the talk was that Enterprise should save their gas money, as they were no match for Manteca, and we know how that turned out.

  4. farmair3
    Posted December 7, 2014 at 11:18 am | Permalink

    I was at the Aptos game last night. Sutter and Orland both North Section teams would beat Aptos by 3 scores. Aptos you can not throw the ball and struggled against a very mediocre SI team. Aptos did not even get a first down until the last drive of the first half. 3 and outs every possession. I drove all the way to San Jose just to see what every one is talking about. Just curious when any of you took the time to see a North Section game in person. My guess would be never so stop slamming teams and programs you know nothing about. I have travelled snd watched NCS and CCS games this year snd the level of football is the same regardless of sections. Sorry but i was Not impressed with Aptos. Defense is scrappy and plays hard. I am not saying Aptos does not deserve to go because I hate to say that to a bunch of kids that have a goal and almost reach it. Salinas lost 5 games people. SI lost 6 games people. And Granite Bay is not the team they have been in previous years. Now had you BEAT granite Bay we would be talking about a different scenario. But you didn’t!!!!! We will find out very soon. Going to be interesting to say the least. Good Luck to all involved.

    • darrensf
      Posted December 7, 2014 at 1:23 pm | Permalink

      I go to almost all the games. From what I’ve seen CCS has much better players. Next level, as in D1 and future NFL. Can’t say the same for North. Sorry. .. you will soon find out when Campy puts up 50 against you guys. It’s just a different level of competition.

  5. NorCalSportsFan
    Posted December 7, 2014 at 11:23 am | Permalink

    Pretty much agree with you Mark with exception that Aptos will chosen for Cal14 reasoning and Macktyson. Both SHP and Aptos are strong candidates, but see Grant as being chosen over SHP (I think there will be lots of discussion on this one). I do think both CCS and NS will have one team in. While I think Sutter is a strong candidate, I think they will be out for above reasons. Wondering what the order of the picking is since this could also have an impact. Depending at which tem is chosen at 1 or 3 whichever first could impact the later choices.

  6. Chris
    Posted December 7, 2014 at 11:46 am | Permalink

    How can Oakdale not be strongly considered for the D2 game after the wins they’ve had against such a strong schedule and their miraculous comeback against Inderkum last night? If they don’t pick us to play next week, that’s going to be absurd.

  7. ltrain
    Posted December 7, 2014 at 1:11 pm | Permalink

    Enterprise got screwed, north section Gets screwed once again. How can people say north section football is weaker… Then ccs… Ask the coaches in California they know north action football is real… It’s sad that state bowl games are determined by the opinion of media outlets who don’t even cover or go to games teams north of sacramento. That’s absurd… I’m glad we go to a state championship playoff next year. Teams can no longer hide from north section teams. How does enterprise not get choosen over oakdale? When this same group of kids went down to oakdale last season and beat them on their own field! This EHS team is essentially the same group that went to state.. It looks like dirty politics and north section as usual was on the receiving end….. This ends next year. I feel sorry for the enterprise boys.

    • darrensf
      Posted December 7, 2014 at 1:25 pm | Permalink

      It’s also sad that your grammar is so inadequate. Doesn’t speak strongly for your position.

      • ltrain
        Posted December 7, 2014 at 1:46 pm | Permalink

        Darrensf,
        It’s also sad that you have no legitimate rebuttal to an argument so you have to anoint yourself as the official calhisports grammar police to justify your existence. And to make yourself feel superior to someone else… We don’t learn gramma up her’ all we do is milk cows play good ole’ country foosball… Who needs edumacation

        • Macktyson
          Posted December 7, 2014 at 2:08 pm | Permalink

          Haha @ ltrain but CCS actually got screwed over, not going to be represented but next year that will all change and looking forward to that and FYI I live in Central section and we got 2 teams, looking forward to seeing them hopefully playing in Carson.

  8. Wonky
    Posted December 7, 2014 at 2:39 pm | Permalink

    Guys, let the kids decide this game on the field. Greatly appreciate the CIF giving Sutter the opportunity to play for a State Bowl berth. Many of us in the Northstate get out once in a while to watch our alma maters (i.e. CAL, Stanford). ATO’s know us by our donor levels. I can name a few athletes who have gone DI and to the NFL. That guy Aaron Rogers from Butte CC he’s not bad.

  9. farmair3
    Posted December 7, 2014 at 3:39 pm | Permalink

    I totally understand your frustration as Aptos fans. I would be disappointed too had Sutter not got chosen. Lets just all remember people these are kids you are attacking with your comments. I would hope that Sutter fans would not call out Aptos fans or their program had the decision been reversed
    I can tell you as far as recruits go Sutter right now sits with 5 or 6 kids being recruited by Boise St, Wyoming, Weber St, Eastern Washington , Sac St and more. I do have a heart for those Aptos kids today that put the work in and had a goal. God Bless them all.

  10. Kearney
    Posted December 7, 2014 at 3:46 pm | Permalink

    Mark, I am surprised you mentioned a “bad call by a referee may have aided The Pacers ” Grant’s Defense held SM’s Offense to 1 TD. That defense is what aided the Pacers!!

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

    Latest News

    Insider Blog

    Cal-Hi Sports on Twitter

    Cal-Hi Sports on Facebook