Week 16 State Rankings Updates

De La Salle defensive backs Das Tautalatasi (committed to Arizona State) and Kevin Griffin (Washington State) both helped shut down the Folsom passing game in the CIF Northern California bowl game and will be going against a faster group of wideouts this week. Photo: Mark Tennis.

De La Salle defensive backs Das Tautalatasi (committed to Arizona State) and Kevin Griffin (Washington State) both helped shut down the Folsom passing game in the CIF Northern California bowl game and will be going against a faster group of wideouts this week.

Chaminade moves up to No. 3 with now having two avenging losses. Enterprise also gets a shout out at No. 25 heading into D2 state bowl game.

Check below for this week’s new list of the State Top 25 football rankings plus a list of the top few teams in this week’s CIF state bowl game divisions.

To read our breakdowns on each Top 25 team, why some of these rankings moves were made, which teams are on the bubble and for extended previews of each CIF state bowl game, you need to be a member of our Gold Club. Join our team today by CLICKING HERE.

Please check out and bookmark our new Cal-Hi Sports Insider Blog: CalHiSports.com/blog For simple updates and insights, check out our twitter page @CalHiSports and for other updates please visit our Facebook page.

WEEK 16 NEW STATE TOP 25 OVERALL FOOTBALL RANKINGS

(Previous ranking in parentheses; through games of Saturday, Dec. 14) *Asterisk indicates season complete.

1. (1) DE LA SALLE (CONCORD) 14-0

2. (2) ST. JOHN BOSCO (BELLFLOWER) 15-0

3. (5) CHAMINADE (WEST HILLS) 13-2

4. (6) SERRA (GARDENA) 13-1*

5. (4) CENTENNIAL (CORONA) 12-3*

6. (3) FOLSOM 14-1*

7. (8) MATER DEI (SANTA ANA) 11-3*

8. (10) MISSION VIEJO 12-1*

9. (11) LONG BEACH POLY (LONG BEACH) 11-2*

10. (12) BAKERSFIELD 12-2

Mater Dei running back Justin Allen helped his team to an outstanding season.

Mater Dei running back Justin Allen helped his team to an outstanding season.

11. (13) DEL ORO (LOOMIS) 13-2

12. (7) SERRA (SAN MATEO) 11-3*

13. (9) MISSION HILLS (SAN MARCOS) 12-2*

14. (14) ALEMANY (MISSION HILLS) 10-3*

15. (16) OCEANSIDE 11-2*

16. (20) EASTLAKE (CHULA VISTA) 10-2*

17. (15) OAK RIDGE (EL DORADO HILLS) 12-2*

18. (18) ELK GROVE 12-2*

19. (17) ARCHBISHOP MITTY (SAN JOSE) 11-2*

20. (21) VISTA MURRIETA (MURRIETA) 12-2*

21. (22) CORONA DEL MAR (NEWPORT BEACH) 15-0

22. (23) CRENSHAW (LOS ANGELES) 10-4*

23. (19) HART (NEWHALL) 12-3*

24. (24) ST. AUGUSTINE (SAN DIEGO) 11-2*

25. (NR) ENTERPRISE (REDDING) 13-0

Team That Dropped Out
Previous No. 25 Cathedral Catholic (San Diego) to make room for Enterprise (which is still playing).

Coach and trainer Chris Asher works with state stat stars and players from state-ranked teams of all ages, helping them to improve their speed, quickness and agility. He is based in Hollywood, also has a role with the UCLA track program and serves athletes within many miles of his location. For more about him, CLICK HERE. For more about his Gold Medal Excellence training program, CLICK HERE.

Coach and trainer Chris Asher works with state stat stars and players from state-ranked teams of all ages, helping them to improve their speed, quickness and agility. He is based in Hollywood, also has a role with the UCLA track program and serves athletes within many miles of his location. For more about him, CLICK HERE. For more about his Gold Medal Excellence training program, CLICK HERE.

CIF STATE BOWL GAME DIVISIONS RANKINGS UPDATES

DIVISION I SOUTH
1. (1) St. John Bosco (Bellflower) 15-0
2. (2) Centennial (Corona) 12-3
3. (3) Mater Dei (Santa Ana) 11-3
4. (5) Mission Viejo 11-1
5. (6) Long Beach Poly (Long Beach) 11-2

DIVISION I NORTH
1. (1) De La Salle (Concord) 14-0
2. (2) Folsom 14-1
3. (5) Del Oro (Loomis) 13-2
4. (3) Serra (San Mateo) 11-2
5. (4) Oak Ridge (El Dorado Hills) 12-2

DIVISION II SOUTH
1. (1) Chaminade (West Hills) 13-2
2. (2) Serra (Gardena) 13-1
3. (3) Hart (Newhall) 12-3
4. (4) St. Augustine (San Diego) 11-2
5. (5) La Serna (Whittier) 12-2

DIVISION II NORTH
1. (1) Enterprise (Redding) 13-0
2. (2) Manteca 13-2
3. (3) Miramonte (Orinda) 12-2
4. (4) Casa Grande (Petaluma) 13-1
5. (5) Clayton Valley (Concord) 10-2

DIVISION III SOUTH
1. (1) Corona del Mar (Newport Beach) 15-0
2. (2) Nordhoff (Ojai) 13-2
3. (3) Garden Grove 13-1
4. (4) El Segundo 10-4
5. (5) Oak Park 11-2

DIVISION III NORTH
1. (4) Sacred Heart Prep (Atherton) 13-1
2. (1) El Cerrito 12-3
3. (2) Marin Catholic (Kentfield) 13-1
4. (3) Campolindo (Moraga) 11-1
5. (5) Analy (Sebastopol) 11-2

DIVISION IV SOUTH
1. (2) Bakersfield Christian 11-2
2. (3) Bishop Diego (Santa Barbara) 9-3
3. (4) Mission Prep (San Luis Obispo) 11-3

DIVISION IV NORTH
1. (1) Central Catholic (Modesto) 14-1
2. (2) McClymonds (Oakland) 10-3
3. (3) Le Grand 12-0

Mark Tennis is the co-founder and publisher of CalHiSports.com. He can be reached at markjtennis@gmail.com. Don’t forget to follow him on Twitter: @CalHiSports


Enjoy this article?

Find out how you can get access to more exclusive content, one-of-a-kind California high school sports content!

Learn More

13 Comments

  1. Mike
    Posted December 16, 2013 at 10:02 pm | Permalink

    I wish we could see the top 1-5 from NorCal match up against the top 1-5 from SoCal. It wouldn’t prove who is the state’s best but it would be some VERY interesting games.

    • Posted December 17, 2013 at 8:59 am | Permalink

      I would like to see the top 10 teams regardless of division from the south take on the north’s top 10. Other than DLS and maybe Folsom I can’t see them winning another game. The south gets screwed in bowl games because most of the best teams play in one or two playoff brackets so 6-8 of the state’s top 25 programs don’t even get a shot to win a bowl game because only playoff champions are allowed to compete. Compare the playoff bracket that SJ Bosco just played to that of DeLaSalle and tell me how that’s fair. It’s a complete lopsided joke to be honest.

      • paul_johnson884
        Posted December 17, 2013 at 11:03 am | Permalink

        I have heard these so cal dominance predictions before.. in 2010 before PA beat CC… and in 2012 before GB beat Poly… and before Grant beat Poly… Facts are Nor cal is 8-4 vs Socal in the Open and D1 games… ALL at least 350 miles from home mind you….man o man is Nor Cal in Darin’s head…

      • Mark Tennis
        Posted December 17, 2013 at 11:27 pm | Permalink

        Agree that SoCal has a lot more good teams than NorCal but that has also never proved that SoCal’s No. 1 team is better than NorCal’s No. 1 team or should always be ranked higher. We hear this all the time in every sport. The CIFSS also wants its top division (Pac-5) to be that competitive and moves leagues around to make it happen. They know it will perhaps hurt teams from the section from winning a state title in a lower division but their priority is to make their section playoffs as strong and as exciting as possible. Sorry you think DLS cheating with its line is the main reason it has won for so long and often so convincingly against the best SoCal team.

  2. Posted December 17, 2013 at 8:56 am | Permalink

    I am very curious as to why SJ Bosco is not ranked #1 when overall strength of schedule is so much greater than DeLaSalle’s? They have faced 9 opponents (10 after this weekend) ranked in the Calpreps top 250. DLS has faced 4 (5 after this weekend). That is a schedule rated 2X more difficult. They have one more victory and no losses to boot. I know until someone beats them you are going to claim that DLS is #1 but shouldn’t rankings be based on merit and not suppositions?

    • Mark Tennis
      Posted December 17, 2013 at 9:10 am | Permalink

      Overall strength of the schedule in our system gets trumped by other facts such as four straight Open Division bowl titles, 40 straight wins, 65 straight wins over California teams, beating SoCal No. 1 teams 28-14, 48-8, 35-0, 49-28. That means nothing in a computer system but it means a lot more in ours. If you like the other way, there are places you can go to see it. That’s just as much merit as strength of schedule.

    • sos
      Posted December 17, 2013 at 11:09 pm | Permalink

      You will find out why this weekend.

  3. paul_johnson884
    Posted December 17, 2013 at 10:23 am | Permalink

    Is this the same computer that has a non playoff team,JSerra, at #15 in CA? The same computer that a week ago had MD #9 in the US of A? Might not be the best proof source.

  4. Scott
    Posted December 17, 2013 at 4:54 pm | Permalink

    Where is Bakersfield in your ratings? Don’t they play Del Oro in bowl game? I don’t see them. Weird. Yet they are the #10 team in the rankings. Confused.

    • Mark Tennis
      Posted December 17, 2013 at 11:19 pm | Permalink

      Bakersfield would be No. 6 in D1 South behind Bosco, Centennial, Mater Dei, Mission Viejo, LB Poly. If they win on Friday, we will probably reconsider that order but Bak would not be put in front of LB Poly.

      • dubc
        Posted December 18, 2013 at 5:01 pm | Permalink

        Bakersfield was one of two teams to beat Poly early last season and did so handily. Poly beat the Drillers early this year in a game that was 13-7 going into the 4th and had several costly turnovers. Not saying Drillers would have won that game, but they have improved each week since, as did Poly last season after their loss to BHS. If they were to play again, I believe the outcome would be different. Furthermore, their only other loss was to Oaks Christian in the opening game. If not for a missed chip-shot field goal as time expired, they pull out the win. Why not put them above LB if they win the D1 bowl game Friday night? Seems like a reversed situation from last year when Poly beat CN in the D1 title game.

  5. Pirate Boy
    Posted December 18, 2013 at 10:38 am | Permalink

    As a Pirate fan, I feel the Pirate coaching staff ruined a potential great season. All their arguments are based on ego and self preservation narcissism. Next year may be a drop, but watch out for the 2015 team ! New qb and great talent. Go Pirates

  6. SK1980
    Posted December 19, 2013 at 11:34 pm | Permalink

    OK… CDM or SH !?!?

Post a Reply to Scott

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

    Latest News

    Insider Blog